@louis-jan

@github-roushan can you share some screenshots for us to grasp the idea how this fixes?

Here @Vanalite

@Vanalite. To add more context. the status code is captured and passed around giving more context on what has happened and for this issue we add a toast with redirection to add the key in settings.

@Vanalite. Do you need anything else?

@github-roushan Pretty cool! But the validation button seems off with other designs. Now only HF has token validation while the others don't. I would recommend to not have the validation button there but let the general error message yields out similarly to how invalid token behaves on other remote providers

@Vanalite . Will remove the button. or i can add the button to everyother place. let me know,what is your design guideline

@Vanalite . Will remove the button. or i can add the button to everyother place. let me know,what is your design guideline

We're now embrace the simplicity. Since we only have a check ✅ icon (e.g import model), you can apply it to the validation. I'm not sure if you can mass apply the validation to all remote providers. In case it's causing trouble, remove the button would be fine

@github-roushan Pretty cool! But the validation button seems off with other designs. Now only HF has token validation while the others don't. I would recommend to not have the validation button there but let the general error message yields out similarly to how invalid token behaves on other remote providers

I believe keeping the validation button is the better approach.
It gives users explicit control over when to authorize their key, rather than relying solely on implicit checks or downstream errors.

To improve the UX, I've ensured there is a timeout mechanism (10 seconds). This handles cases where Hugging Face might be slow or unresponsive—if validation hangs, the button will reset, allowing the user to retry easily.

I plan to extend this pattern to other providers for consistency. But for now this looks good

@Vanalite